Meade Telescopes: Models, Reviews & Ratings

Photo of author
Written By: Zane Landers
Category: Learn

History of Meade Instruments

Meade was founded in 1972 by John Diebel. Originally, Meade was an importer, primarily sourcing from Japan and operating out of John’s apartment, but their offerings soon expanded. Diebel began providing his Japanese manufacturers with design input, and by 1977, Meade was operating out of a full-sized warehouse in Costa Mesa, California. Around this time, Meade began producing high-quality equatorially-mounted Newtonians with their own optics, sourced from former Cave and Coulter Optical employees.

In 1980, Meade made a permanent name for itself with the 2080, an 8” Schmidt-Cassegrain.

Excluding the failed Criterion Dynamax line, Meade was the first manufacturer to attempt to directly compete with Celestron’s C8, which had been on the market for ten years and was beginning to show its age. The 2080 offered superior rigidity with its extendable telescoping-leg tripod, as well as a DC-powered worm gear drive compared to the C8’s AC-powered spur gears.

A 2040 4” SCT and a 2120 10” SCT Meade telescope soon followed. Eventually, these scopes led to the demise of Meade’s Newtonian line. Meade continued innovating and often outpacing Celestron throughout the 1980s, but the high demand for telescopes thanks to Halley meant that both companies’ quality control suffered. Meade felt this the most – we have looked through many Meades from the 1980s with mushy, fuzzy views at high power. There are some Celestron scopes that had these issues, but we have seen more mushy Meades than Celestrons from this period.

In the 1990s, Meade introduced their LX200 line, which is still available in an upgraded version today. The LX200 was the first GoTo telescope that was readily available and affordable for amateurs; Celestron’s earlier efforts at similar systems were largely failures. They also introduced the ETX, a 90mm Maksutov-Cassegrain with optics (albeit not mechanics) comparable to the famed Questar, and eventually rolled out the AutoStar computerized handset for both the LX200 and ETX. At one point, they succeeded in driving Celestron to near-extinction, but Celestron came roaring back in the mid-2000s, thankfully preventing a monopoly by Meade.

However, all was not well. By the mid-90s, Meade seemed to have largely become concerned solely about profit. Their customer service was and remains poor, and more and more of their sales became “department-store” telescopes sold at big box stores with bad mounts and accessories designed solely to prey on unsuspecting consumers. Meade Instruments went public in 1997 and attempted to buy the dying Celestron in 2002, being stopped only by the FTC.

In 2006, Meade Instruments moved most of their telescope production to Mexico, citing profitability concerns. They also introduced the “RCX” line, a series of modified Schmidt-Cassegrains they claimed were Ritchey-Chretien telescopes – false advertising. Not only did manufacturers of actual RCs sue, but the RCX scopes were plagued by technical problems of all sorts, and Meade’s customer service quality didn’t help. Various other technical issues happened with other telescopes, and the financial crisis of 2008 further damaged their sales. All of this resulted in them nearing bankruptcy by the early 2010s.

Meade was bought by Ningbo Sunny Electronics Co. in 2013. A lawsuit by Orion in 2019 revealed that Meade and Sunny colluded with Synta, the present owner of Sky-Watcher and Celestron, to fix prices on telescopes, as well as that Meade and Sunny were commercially related to Synta in some way, which led to Meade’s filing for bankruptcy and a subsequent buyout by Orion. Orion seems to be keeping Meade on life support and slowly phasing out or discontinuing products as of 2022, but whether this is the end of Meade or simply a bout of pandemic supply chain troubles combined with a corporate reshuffling is incredibly unclear.

Meade Telescope Products’ Quality

Today, Meade sells various high-end lines of Schmidt-Cassegrains (which hardly anyone seems to buy), its ETX telescopes, various low-end/poorly constructed manual and computerized scopes, a few nice manual scopes and Dobsonians, and the Coronado solar telescopes—which have, sadly, also seen a decline in quality control in recent years. As of 2022, Meade is also reshaping and discontinuing many of their products as the company seems to be in the process of shutting down for good since their buyout by Orion. 

Meade’s occasionally false or misleading advertising, poor customer service, lack of spare parts, and constantly changing product lines make it hard for us to recommend them as a brand. They still make some nice telescopes, but we would not particularly recommend buying anything from them with a computer involved, and if you do, be warned – it may have issues and they will not be of much help with solving anything. We have had problems with some relatively recent Meade products and needed spare parts, and customer service literally told us to go to eBay and find them ourselves because they didn’t have any.

Meade Telescopes Reviewed By Us

Where to Buy Meade Instruments Telescopes?

In the US, most of the online Meade telescopes are sold through:

7 thoughts on “Meade Telescopes: Models, Reviews & Ratings”

  1. I have to agree with your review of Meade telescopes. We have a 12″ LX-200 ACF and a 10″ LX-200 ACF and both have had control board failures. We are on our 2nd board for the 12″ and the 3rd board for the 10″. Presently only the 12″ is operational since the 10″ failed almost 2 years ago and presently meade cannot supply the control boards nor do they have any idea when or if they ever will be available again. We meade owners had hoped for better service once Orion took the helm but they seem just a bad and perhaps even worse. I agree with your review/opinion of Meade. I could never recommend them and if someone were to ask me I would have to recommend Celestron.

  2. Wow…
    Sad to read so much “dirty business” went on with a science instrument company.
    Looks like Celestron finished on top!

    • Nice 114mm f/8, kinda undermounted and has some mechanical issues (some units have plastic focuser/finder which are awful) but excellent views at the eyepiece and generally pretty sturdy. Would recommend if under $100 used


Leave a Comment