315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings
Having collaborated with astronomy retailers and as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. See full disclosure.

Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ Review – Not Recommended

The Celestron AstroMaster 130 is widely advertised and praised as one of the better beginner telescopes out there, but it suffers from several shortcomings that tend to make it infuriating to use out of the box.
Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 2/5

Focuser: 2/5

Mount: 3/5

Moon & Planets: 3/5

Rich Field: 3/5

Accessories: 1/5

Ease of use: 3/5

Portability: 4/5

Value: 2/5

Read our scoring methodology here

Celestron’s AstroMaster series of telescopes is often recommended by misinformed astronomy veterans, as the scopes have at least the appearance of quality and the Celestron brand is dear in the hearts of many older astronomers – despite today’s Celestron having little in common with the US-owned Celestron of decades ago. While they’re certainly an improvement over the PowerSeeker line, I’ve found that most AstroMaster telescopes have questionable, if not downright bad build and optical quality, and many come with unusable low-power eyepieces designed to fulfill silly promises about terrestrial viewing, as is the case with the AstroMaster 130.

Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #37 of 44 ~$350 telescopes





Celestron Astromaster 130EQ


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Orion SpaceProbe 130ST EQ Reflector

What We Like

  • Acceptable mount
  • Reasonably good views of deep-sky objects
  • Wide field of view

What We Don't Like

  • Questionable optical quality
  • Poor included low-power eyepiece
  • Equatorial mount can be a headache for beginners
Not Recommended Telescope

If you’re already stuck with one, the AstroMaster 130 will work acceptably with some tweaking and upgrades, but if you’re shopping for a new telescope you’ve got much better options than the AstroMaster line.

Between the price (only a little less than a 6” Dobsonian), the terrible low-power eyepiece, the inconveniences of using a Newtonian on a German equatorial mount, and the fact that Celestron at least sometimes supplies these telescopes with spherical primary mirrors, I do not recommend this telescope under any circumstance. It is better than some of the other junk Celestron sells, but it is still a long way from a decent telescope.

Overview of Astromaster 130EQ Optics Performance

The Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ is a 130mm f/5 Newtonian. At least on paper, it’s identical to Celestron’s StarSense Explorer, Omni XLT, Astro-Fi 130, SkyProdigy 130, and NexStar SLT 130mm telescopes, as well as the venerable Astronomers Without Borders OneSky, Zhumell Z130, and others. However, trouble has arisen with the AstroMaster 130EQ scopes lately.

Seemingly as part of an effort to reduce manufacturing costs and maximize profit, Celestron is putting spherical primary mirrors in at least some of its AstroMaster 130EQ units. These mirrors cannot focus light correctly (a proper Newtonian telescope uses a parabolic mirror), and they make the telescope nearly unusable at high magnifications.

The bulk of the AstroMaster 130 scopes I’ve seen have had acceptable primary mirrors–usually not quite parabolic but not quite spherical either–but a few have had spherical primaries that made for mushy views. I’ve also seen a few with great optics.

When consulted, Celestron gives varying answers as to whether the AstroMaster 130 scopes are sold with spherical mirrors or not. One should not have to play the lottery to get a decent instrument with hundreds of dollars on the line, and Celestron should be able to give a concrete answer as to the nature of their product. This alone disqualifies the AstroMaster 130 from being a serious recommendation in our book.

The rest of the 130’s optical tube is fairly standard in its design and function. Both the primary and secondary mirrors are fully collimatable, and the focuser is a standard plastic 1.25” rack-and-pinion unit. The tube attaches to its mount with a pair of felt-lined metal tube rings and a short Vixen-style dovetail, which allows the scope to be balanced and the eyepiece rotated to a comfortable position, as well as for the scope to be installed on a different mount. One of the rings has a small ¼ 20 threaded screw/knob that allows you to piggyback a DSLR on top – if the mount is motorized with an aftermarket clock drive such as Celestron’s Logic Drive, it will work well enough for wide-field astrophotography.

Quality of Eyepieces Supplied with 130EQ

The 130EQ, like all of the AstroMaster Newtonian reflector models, comes with a 20mm erecting Kellner eyepiece for low magnification views. This eyepiece is identical to the one supplied with Celestron’s PowerSeeker scopes. As for why Celestron supplies it, the answer is simple. All of the AstroMasters are advertised as usable for terrestrial viewing because Celestron has managed to convince consumers that a Newtonian reflector on an equatorial mount is designed for such use. This useless gimmick of a feature has resulted in an eyepiece with a roughly 30-degree apparent field of view, lots of internal reflections and light loss, fuzzy images, and an almost entirely plastic build. It’s also a bit too much magnification (33x) to be a great low-power “finder” eyepiece, and thanks to its narrow apparent field, it only gives a true field of view of 0.9 degrees—less than two full moons across, making it difficult to find many objects. Galileo himself would probably complain about the abysmally low quality of this eyepiece.

The 10mm Kellner supplied for medium power (65x with the 130EQ) works well, and thanks to its much greater and more reasonable apparent field of view (around 50 degrees) it actually achieves a similar true field to the 20mm Kellner.

The Finderscope

The Celestron AstroMasters used to come with a strangely designed, cheap, built-in, non-removable red-dot finder that had a nice switch and glass window, but suffered from alignment problems. Newer AstroMasters have a standard, run-of-the-mill red dot finder attached with a strange plastic jig. I find the placement a little odd, but it is actually more comfortable to reach than the standard location of finders on a lot of telescopes.

Reviewing The CG-3 Equatorial Mount

The 130EQ comes on a lightweight German equatorial mount that Celestron calls the CG-3. While not the heaviest duty thing you can buy, the mount works well enough for the 130mm f/5 OTA and it should work okay with a DSLR camera piggybacked on top.

Another thing to consider is that German equatorial mounts like the CG-3 are not the most comfortable ergonomically with a Newtonian telescope. The eyepiece can wind up in some odd positions. The 130EQ optical tube can be rotated in its rings to adjust the position of the eyepiece, but you could easily throw off the balance and/or skew the pointing of the telescope in the process of doing so.

The CG-3 comes with flexible slow motion controls for adjustments on both axes. However, you’ll need to switch the right ascension cable from one side of the mount to the other depending on where you’re looking in the sky. The mount has no polar scope, but for a scope meant for visual use and most simple astrophotography, this isn’t really an issue. The mount does have slow-motion altitude and azimuth adjustments for precise polar alignment.

The CG-3 has a Vixen dovetail saddle so in theory you could put a different optical tube on it, but it wouldn’t really make financial sense to do so under most circumstances.

The CG-3 can be equipped with Celestron’s “Logic Drive” for hands-free tracking. The drive also allows for piggyback astrophotography, but even this will probably strain the mount somewhat.

What can you see with the Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ?

Even if you are unfortunate enough to get a sample with mediocre to poor optics, the Celestron AstroMaster 130 can show you a lot of deep sky objects, provided you obtain a better low-power eyepiece than the one included with the telescope. The brighter open star clusters and nebulae such as the Orion, Lagoon, and Swan will look fantastic with half-decent skies. Some of the bright galaxies, such as Andromeda, M82, and M64, will show their dust lanes, and under really dark skies, M51 and M101 might just reveal their spiral arms.

Within the solar system, you’re limited primarily by the scope’s optical quality. With a good sample of the 130EQ, Jupiter’s Great Red Spot, the Cassini division in Saturn’s rings, the ice caps and albedo markings of Mars, and even the tiniest lunar craters (as small as a few miles across) are visible with the telescope. With a poor unit, the planets are mushy and devoid of fine detail, though the rings of Saturn and the cloud belts of Jupiter are still visible and the Moon may look acceptable to a beginner.

Astrophotography with Astromaster 130EQ

Neither the CG-3 mount nor the AstroMaster’s focuser are heavy duty enough for astrophotography with a DSLR, though webcam planetary imaging is in theory possible with a 3x or 5x Barlow lens coupled to the optical tube. But in practice, you’re really limited to shots with a mobile phone or the like – and this is assuming the mirror is parabolic and not spherical, which is a real gamble.

Alternative Recommendations

For the same price as or a little more than that of the AstroMaster 130EQ, there are a number of other, much higher-quality telescopes you should definitely consider instead, including the following:

  • The Apertura DT6 offers a significant boost in aperture, much better build and optical quality, superior accessories, and a stable, easy-to-use Dobsonian mount.
  • The Sky-Watcher 6” Traditional provides similar capabilities to the SkyLine 6 but with a true 2” focuser, allowing for the use of 2” eyepieces.
  • The Sky-Watcher Heritage 130 offers the same aperture as the 130EQ but with better optics, better accessories, a collapsible tube, and a simple tabletop Dobsonian mount.
  • The Zhumell Z130, like the Heritage, offers superior accessories, optics, and a simpler mount than the 130EQ but with a closed tube design.

For more information on what telescope is best for you and your budget, check out our Telescope Rankings and Best Telescopes article.

Aftermarket Accessory Recommendations

The only accessory we’d really recommend purchasing specifically for the AstroMaster 130EQ is a better low-power eyepiece to replace the awful 20mm erecting eyepiece that comes included. A 25mm Plossl such as the Orion 25mm Sirius would be our choice, but you could get fancy and go with a more expensive wide-angle unit like an Explore Scientific 24mm 68-degree or Agena 25mm Starguider. Any of the aforementioned eyepieces will provide a significantly better viewing experience with the scope.

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

10 thoughts on “Celestron AstroMaster 130EQ Review – Not Recommended”

  1. What would be a decent telescope in the same price range, or possibly a little more (to be decent, I guess)?

  2. Could you please suggest a Telescope with traditional mount for Astrophotography , most of the suggestions here I see are with DOB mounts which not serve the purpose for Astrophotography. Please suggest telescopes with traditional 3 Point or equatorial mounts

  3. can i if possible/is it worthwhile, purchasing a go to mount for this model. my wife has bought me this model and i am keen[ but green] and the finder seems to stop working at the worst time therefore i am finding targeting or even finding any stars [even the moon i am finding a challenge] please help

  4. Hi,
    I totally agree with the comments at the beginning of the article. I encountered all the issues mentionned.
    With my 130/650EQ, the provided “terrestrial” erecting 20mm eyepiece is a piece of garbage (dull image, low contrast, narrow field of view) that I quickly swapped for a 26mm Super Plössl Meade eyepiece (~50€ at the time).
    The eq mount is heavy and not practical to use for a beginner. Thankfully I had the ressources to build a custom Dobsonian mount out of plywood, which greatly improved the observation experience.
    I’m still stuck with the mediocre primary mirror at the bottom of the tube. Quality image is so poor I never managed to resolve a single star in the globular cluster M13 even with the best efforts to collimate the instrument properly, which is pretty frustrating. I’d like to swap this (most likely spherical) mirror with a parabolic one, but I struggle to find one online.
    In short I do not recomment the purchase, even though I can’t suggest a decent alternative.


Leave a Comment