315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings

Celestron NexStar 130SLT Review: Partially Recommended

The NexStar 130SLT works, but its mediocre and outdated mounting isn’t exactly the best option for the price.
Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 5/5

Focuser: 3/5

Mount: 3/5

Moon & Planets: 3/5

Rich Field: 5/5

Accessories: 3/5

Ease of use: 4/5

Portability: 4/5

Value: 2/5

Read our scoring methodology here

Celestron’s NexStar 130SLT is the largest telescope in its largely-lackluster SLT (Star Locating Telescope) line. The 130SLT’s basic design isn’t necessarily bad, but given its outdated and less-than-stable mount and a rather egregious price tag, we think there are some better alternatives available. 

Celestron Nexstar 130SLT

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #30 of 37 ~$700 Telescopes





Celestron NexStar 130SLT


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P is a way better GoTo telescope in every way. If you specifically need a tripod-mounted computerized reflector in the price range, the options are limited to Celestron StarSense Explorer DX 130AZ(locates, but doesn't track), Celestron NexStar 130SLT, and the Celestron Astro Fi 130. Of these, Celestron Astro Fi 130 is indeed the best.

What We Like

  • Easy, no tool setup
  • Light, portable, and affordable
  • Wide field of views
  • Computerized go-to tracking
  • Decent aperture
  • Easy alignment process

What We Don't Like

  • Shaky
  • Sensitive to vibration
  • Power hog
  • GoTo technology is complicated, frustrating, and doesn’t always work
  • Not the best value
Partially Recommended

If you must have a GoTo scope in this aperture range, consider the better-quality Celestron Astro-Fi 130 – otherwise, a Dobsonian is a clearly superior alternative to the wobbly and outdated 130SLT.

130SLT Optical Performance Overview

OTA of NexStar 130SLT
Pic by Zane Landers

The Celestron NexStar 130SLT computerized telescope is a standard 130mm f/5 Newtonian like the Orion SpaceProbe 130ST, Zhumell Z130, and others. It uses a plastic 2” focuser, which is theoretically capable of handling 2” eyepieces. But it’s questionable how well the focuser can handle a heavy accessory if the secondary mirror is big enough for a wide-angle eyepiece to not vignette or, of course, if the too-small SLT mount can handle another kilogram of weight being added to it.

At f/5, there is some coma, and many inexpensive eyepieces will gradually lose sharpness toward the edge of the field. Collimation accuracy is also rather important, but it’s not that difficult to get an f/5 Newtonian collimated with even the most basic collimation cap—or a bright star. 

Included Eyepieces and Red Dot Finder

The 130SLT includes two 1.25” Kellner eyepieces, a 25mm for 26x magnification and a 10mm for 65x magnification. These are enough to get you started, but you’ll want additional eyepieces for more magnification options, particularly for viewing fine detail on the Moon and planets or splitting double stars. 

For aligning the mount to the sky, the 130SLT includes Celestron’s standard StarPointer red dot sight, which is all you really need.

The Celestron NexStar SLT’s Alt-Az Mount

Celestron Nexstar 130SLT in room
Pic by Zane Landers

The Celestron NexStar SLT mount is a pretty simple, inexpensive alt-azimuth mount that moves up and down, left-to-right. To use it, you enter the time, date, and your location, then sight the telescope on any two or three bright stars. The mount can then map out the rest of the sky and point the telescope at any object of your choosing. This is fairly standard for most GoTo mounts. The SLT mount uses a Vixen dovetail saddle, so you can easily swap in other telescopes with Vixen dovetail bars if you wish, provided they don’t exceed the SLT mount’s capacity or crash into the base.

The SLT mount looks well-made and performs okay for the most part, but its main flaw is the skinny steel tripod legs supplied with it. They easily twist and buckle when they’re extended to a comfortable height, making the scope’s pointing less-than-accurate. Compensating for this issue is possible with some DIY workarounds, but it’s probably easier to just buy a different telescope with a more solid mounting.

Alternative Recommendations

The Celestron NexStar 130SLT’s poor value for the price, less-than-steady tripod, and cumbersome hand controller eliminate it from being a strong recommendation in our book. Here are some of our alternative picks, sorted by price and ranked from best to worst in value and capability.

Under $700

  • The Apertura AD8/Zhumell Z8/Orion SkyLine 8 offers 2.5 times as much light-collecting surface area thanks to its huge 8” primary mirror, giving you 250% brighter images – and nearly double the resolving power. The AD8/Z8 features a dual-speed 2” Crayford focuser, a simple, rock-solid, and easy-to-use Dobsonian mount, and a wide assortment of well-made accessories to get you started with.
  • The Explore Scientific 10” Hybrid Dobsonian offers double the resolving power of the 130SLT and 4 times as much light gathering power in a compact and portable package – the tube is composed of 8 interlocking truss poles which disassemble in minutes leaving you with a compact arrangement when dismantled. The 10” Truss also features a single-speed 2” Crayford focuser, though the included accessories aren’t the best and the tube really needs a shroud.
  • The Orion SkyQuest XT8 offers 250% more light gathering ability than the NexStar 130SLT, as with any 8” telescope, atop a rock-steady Dobsonian mount with a solid mechanical design. The included features and accessories, however, are a bit lacking out of the box compared to some of the other 8” Dobsonian options available at this price point.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P offers slightly more aperture – and thus greater resolving power and light-gathering ability – than the NexStar 130SLT with a GoTo mount that’s operated exclusively via your smartphone or tablet with the SynScan or SkySafari Pro app. The 150P can also be aimed manually, and features a collapsible tube for maximum portability. A manual version, the Heritage 150P, is available at a lower price and is identical apart from the lack of motorized tracking or GoTo.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 130P features the same optics as the 130SLT but in a collapsible tube with a dual manual/GoTo tabletop Dobsonian mount which is controlled with an app on your smartphone or tablet. The Virtuoso GTi 130P is available in a manual format, the Heritage 130P, as with the 150P from Sky-Watcher.
  • The Celestron Astro-Fi 130 is essentially identical to the NexStar 130SLT, but features Celestron’s Astro-Fi onboard WiFi system allowing you to control the scope with your phone or tablet, and sturdier tripod legs that significantly improve usability and stability compared to the flimsy NexStar SLT tripod.


  • The Apertura AD10/Zhumell Z10/Orion SkyLine 10 has 4 times as much light gathering and double the resolving power of the NexStar 130SLT and features a stable, easy-to-aim manual Dobsonian base. As with the AD8/Z8, this scope features a huge variety of included accessories as well as built-in features like a dual-speed 2” Crayford focuser and a cooling fan for the primary mirror.
  • The Celestron StarSense Explorer 8” Dobsonian features a computerized object locator in the form of Celestron’s StarSense Explorer technology, which turns your smartphone into an easy-to-use tool to aim the telescope around the night sky without any motors or even much in the way of an initial alignment. As with any 8” Dobsonian, the StarSense Explorer 8” delivers more than 2.5x the light gathering power and close to double the resolution of the NexStar 130SLT. The StarSense Explorer 8” Dobsonian also features cutouts in the base and handles built into the tube to enhance portability.
  • The Sky-Watcher 8” FlexTube Dobsonian features a collapsible tube making it easier to store and transport than a regular 10” or 8” Dobsonian, along with a pair of eyepieces and a 9×50 straight-through finder included with the telescope. However, there’s no significant weight savings compared to a standard 8” and the scope needs a shroud to keep light and dew out of the open extended tube.

Aftermarket Accessory Recommendations

Aside from its less-than-stable mount, the Celestron NexStar 130SLT’s biggest flaw may be its very short focal length of only 650mm. For high power, a 6mm “goldline” provides a measly 108x. The best planetary and lunar views with the 130SLT are arguably obtained at magnifications between 140 and 180x when atmospheric conditions permit, and for that, we’d recommend something like the Astromania 4mm Planetary, which will give you 163x with the 130SLT.

Another thing we’d recommend is a rechargeable battery/power supply for the SLT mount. If you use the scope frequently, you’ll probably burn through a lot of AA batteries quickly, and if you use it infrequently, there’s the concern of corrosion in the battery compartment to worry about. A rechargeable battery solves both of these problems and keeps you from having to run the scope from your car or a long AC cord, which is inconvenient. 

What can you see with the Celestron NexStar 130SLT?

The wide field of view and large, but not huge, aperture of the Celestron NexStar 130SLT make it good for looking at large deep-sky objects like open star clusters like M11 and M45. You’ll also have no trouble viewing the Orion Nebula or the Swan, resolving a few stars in bright globular clusters, and spotting a few planetary nebulae like the Ring and Dumbbell. Most galaxies will remain little more than fuzzy blobs, though a few, such as M31 and M82, might show dust lanes. Keep in mind, however, that if maximum image brightness and detail are your goals, dark skies and aperture rule over all else. The 130SLT will struggle to show you much in the way of deep-sky views if you live in a city beyond the brightest star clusters. 

The NexStar 130SLT can show a fair amount of detail on the Moon and planets, provided it’s collimated, though the 65x that the stock 10mm eyepiece can provide isn’t exactly going to be jaw-dropping. With a more powerful eyepiece (albeit not too powerful; remember, magnification isn’t everything), you’ll have no trouble spotting the cloud belts on Jupiter, the Cassini division in Saturn’s rings, and albedo features on Mars. Venus’ and Mercury’s phases, along with the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, can also be seen. And, of course, you’ll love viewing the moon. Uranus and Neptune are easy to locate with the NexStar 130SLT’s GoTo system, but will remain bluish-blurry dots at best and starlike points at worst.

Astrophotography with the NexStar 130SLT

The 130SLT’s mount does track, but it’s not accurate enough for serious deep-sky astrophotography. The short focal length of the scope itself doesn’t lend itself well to planetary imaging. A 5x Barlow and a planetary camera will let you photograph Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and the Moon at a reasonable sampling size, but it’s a cumbersome setup, and there are better telescopes for the job if planetary astrophotography is your primary goal.

Optical Design:Newtonian Reflector
Mount Design:Motorized Alt-Azimuth
Focal Length:650mm
Focal Ratio:f/5
Focuser:2" Single Speed Rack & Pinion
Fully Assembled Weight:18 lbs
Warranty:Celestron 2 Years

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

14 thoughts on “Celestron NexStar 130SLT Review: Partially Recommended”

    • The StarNavigator NG scopes are actually less well-built than the NexStar SLTs, and I would hesitate to recommend either.

  1. I have found it to be a decent scope for most types of viewing, but I agree on the shakiness, the power consumption and the GoTo tech being too complicated. Having to enter the date and time every time, really?! I do like the sturdiness and quality of the tripod, but I am really disappointed with some of the plastic parts such as the main battery cover, the end cap and the finderscope battery cover. They look and feel cheap.
    Replacing the battery on the finderscope is very difficult, mainly because of the plastic cover. The end cap doesn’t fit very well and kept popping off. I had to resort to lining the inside rim of the cap with electrical tape. Also agree with mount issues.
    3 star rating at the most.

  2. HI Zane,

    I liked your blog and the fact that you have logical yes or no for specific requirement.

    I want to buy telescope in the range of 300-400 to see planetary moons and if possible some binary stars. I need it computerized.

    Please advise.


  3. Hi,

    My wife is an artist and her current focus is astronomy. I want to buy her a computerized telescope with tripod and ability to take sharp pictures on the smart phone or captured on a portable media under $400. I see a lot of good reviews by you that pertain to table-top telescopes. I was first focused on Celestron lines (114LCM, Astro 130 and SLT 130). Now I am a bit confused as what would be the best option.


    • Why do you need a tripod?

      As far as under $400 – a 6″ or 8″ Dobsonian or one of the Celestron Astro-Fi scopes is probably best.

  4. Been using the SLT for 2 years.
    Yep the mount is shaky but you can mitigate some of this by tightening up the bolts a bit on the mount and the fork clutch may need a bit of a tighten. Put a weight on the leg spreader tray. Also don’t extend the legs further than you need. Collimating using a cheap laser Collimating tool is a breeze once you have done it a couple of times. I do mine in a few mins every time I setup. Plenty of vids on utube cover this. It does take about 7 seconds to settle down after you use the focuser and can be a bit of a pain getting sharp focus, But that not just the SLT. A lot of single arm mounts suffer the same issue. I have fitted a cheap Orion electric focuser on mine which has helped a lot. I would not recommend using the battery option on this. Use a cheap power adaptor off of Amazon look for the correct amps and voltage. I been using an old one off of my old music keyboard since I got the scope. A car battery will be a good option for this scope. No need to go for an expensive deep cycle leisure battery if you’re just using the mount. A car battery will last long enough for a good night viewing. Check out some of the Astronomer websites lots of people use them or the car jumpstart power packs.
    I’m not too keen on the Celestron hand controller its hard to make the letters out in the dark. You can control the brightness of the red light behind the buttons but that isn’t the issue for me. It more about the contrast of black letters against red light that’s the issue.
    Yes you can put a camera on this you just need to get a T adapter. Max 20 to 30 second exposure time I’m afraid. But that the same for all Alt Az mounts.
    You can use a web cam conversion plenty of vids on utube again, You will need to use a Barlow Lens to achieve focus,
    I used to struggle with alignment a lot but I have it down to a tee now.
    Remember to use the bubble level on the mount to level the mount up.
    Align the red dot finder in the day time.
    Use a low powered eye piece to align the scope.
    We Brits have to remember that we set dates by DD/MM/YY but the hand controller does it the US way MM/DD/YY.
    I’m starting to outgrow mine now but I have added a couple of things to my kit that I can carry over to a new Celestron Scope.
    2-inch-wide field 24mm eye piece. Yes, this scope can take 2-inch eye pieces and that little extra weight helps with vibration.
    Celestron wireless dongle so I don’t need to use the hand controller. Use the free sky portal android app to control the scope. I get perfect alignment using this.
    All in all, I’ve had a lot of pleasure using the SLT 130 and I would consider it a good scope for the beginner or someone who may not be ready for the cost of a better setup.
    This is an expensive hobby to take up so check out prices carefully. You can only use the scope when its not cloudy.
    Hope this helps and Dark Skies
    PS those in the UK if your looking for a 130 SLT try giving COSTCO a try. Under £300 with a free plossel eye piece kit to help get you going

    • Hey Lee, I’ve been struggling to view planets with this scope but I’m only at this hobby for a few months now. The only thing I can successfully view is the moon so far. When I try to view Mars, I see the outline of the secondary mirror obstructing the view of the planet. (I understand Mars is not the best planet to be viewing right now..but besides this fact, I can not wrap my head around how to solve this..any help would be greatly appreciated!

      • You’re out of focus. The focuser is not used to “zoom” – if you’ve got it focused for the Moon it will remain in focus on any other target.

  5. I keep wondering which is worse, the tripod included with the 130 SLT or a table-wobble with a 6 inch Dob in a backyard or in the field?

  6. I have used NexStar 130 SLT since September 2022 for astrophotography. I had to make some modifications to the primary mirror (shift its position ~2cm inside the tube) to make it possible to focus the image on the EOS 1000D camera. Finally, I made a lot of Messier, Caldwell, NGC, and IC objects.
    There are some disadvantages, especially that you can’t use exposures longer than 60 seconds. Also, because of the Alt-Azm mount, the field of view is rotating, and the battery set os draining quickly. Though it is hard to fight with the first two, the last one—the battery—I solved by using a 12V Li-Ion pack at 4000 mA, which gives ~5–6h of observation period.
    The big advantages are: mobility, easy-to-use GoTO (after some experience, entire settings take ~10–15 minutes), and any laptops, aqus, or cables are not required.

    It is not the best system for astrophotography, but anyway, it may provide surprisingly nice images of many DSO, which gives a lot of fun and excitement.

    Using this scope, I could also make some tiny-science: designating a light curve for the latest supernova, sn2023ixf


Leave a Comment