Our experts have ranked 150+ telescopes
Disclosure - If you buy something via our link, we may earn a commission with no additional expense to you.

Celestron NexStar 130SLT Review: Partially Recommended

The NexStar 130SLT works, but its mediocre and outdated mounting isn’t exactly the best option for the price.

Celestron’s NexStar 130SLT is the largest telescope in its largely-lackluster SLT (Star Locating Telescope) line. The 130SLT’s basic design isn’t necessarily bad, but given its outdated and less-than-stable mount and a rather egregious price tag, we think there are some better alternatives available. 

How It Stacks Up

Ranked #21 of 29 ~$600 telescopes

Rank 21
Celestron NexStar 130SLT
3.9
What We Like

  • Easy, no tool setup
  • Light, portable, and affordable
  • Wide field of views
  • Computerized go-to tracking
  • Decent aperture
  • Easy alignment process


What We Don't Like

  • Shaky
  • Sensitive to vibration
  • Power hog
  • GoTo technology is complicated, frustrating, and doesn’t always work
  • Not the best value


Bottom Line
Partially Recommended

If you must have a GoTo scope in this aperture range, consider the better-quality Celestron Astro-Fi 130 – otherwise, a Dobsonian is a clearly superior alternative to the wobbly and outdated 130SLT.

For purchasing this telescope, we highly recommend HighPointScientific, the largest telescope retailer in the United States. Their knowledge of the subject, combined with features like a price match promise, free lifetime tech support, a 30-day return policy, and financing choices, makes them a great pick.

130SLT Optical Performance Overview

The Celestron NexStar 130SLT computerized telescope is a standard 130mm f/5 Newtonian like the Orion SpaceProbe 130ST, Zhumell Z130, and others. It uses a plastic 2” focuser, which is theoretically capable of handling 2” eyepieces, but it’s questionable how well the focuser can handle a heavy accessory if the secondary mirror is big enough for a wide-angle eyepiece to not vignette, or, of course, if the too-small SLT mount can handle another kilogram of weight being added to it.

At f/5, there is some coma, and many inexpensive eyepieces will gradually lose sharpness towards the edge of the field. Collimation accuracy is also rather important, but it’s not that difficult to get an f/5 Newtonian collimated with even the most basic collimation cap – or a bright star. 

Celestron NexStar 130SLT GoTo

Included Eyepieces and Red Dot Finder

The 130SLT includes two 1.25” Kellner eyepieces, a 25mm for 26x magnification and a 10mm for 65x. These are enough to get you started, but you’ll want additional eyepieces for more magnification options, particularly for viewing fine detail on the Moon and planets or splitting double stars. 

For aligning the mount to the sky, the 130SLT includes Celestron’s standard StarPointer red dot sight, which is all you really need.

The Celestron NexStar SLT’s Alt-Az Mount

The Celestron NexStar SLT mount is a pretty simple, inexpensive alt-azimuth mount that moves up and down, left-to-right. To use it, you enter the time, date, and your location, then sight the telescope on any two or three bright stars. The mount can then map out the rest of the sky and point the telescope at any object of your choosing. This is pretty standard stuff for most GoTo mounts. The SLT mount uses a Vixen dovetail saddle, so you can easily swap in other telescopes with Vixen dovetail bars if you wish, provided they don’t exceed the SLT mount’s capacity or crash into the base.

The SLT mount looks well-made and performs okay for the most part, but its main flaw is the skinny steel tripod legs supplied with it. They easily twist and buckle when they’re extended to a comfortable height, making the scope’s pointing less-than-accurate. Compensating for this issue is possible with some DIY workarounds, but it’s probably easier to just buy a different telescope with a more solid mounting.

Alternative Recommendations

For the same price as the Celestron NexStar 130SLT computerized telescope, there are some other scopes you might want to consider:

  • The Celestron Astro-Fi 130 is more or less an upgraded 130SLT with better tripod legs and can be controlled via a phone or tablet instead of a hand controller at a lower price to boot.
  • The Apertura AD8/Zhumell Z8/Orion SkyLine 8 offers significantly more aperture than the 130SLT, with better accessories and a more stable, more convenient mount.
  • The Orion StarBlast 6i offers more aperture and a better mount than the 130SLT, with a computerized, albeit not motorized, pointing system.

Aftermarket Accessory Recommendations

The Celestron NexStar 130SLT’s greatest weakness, besides its less-than-stable mounting, is arguably its extremely short focal length of just 650mm. For high power, a 6mm “goldline” provides a measly 108x. The best planetary and lunar views with the 130SLT are arguably obtained at magnifications between 140 and 180x when atmospheric conditions permit, and for that we’d recommend something like the Astromania 4mm Planetary, which will give you 163x with the 130SLT.

Another thing we’d recommend is a rechargeable battery/power supply for the SLT mount. If you use the scope frequently, you’ll probably burn through a lot of AA batteries quickly, and if you use it infrequently, there’s the concern of corrosion in the battery compartment to worry about. A rechargeable battery solves both these problems while avoiding the inconvenience of running the scope off your car or a long AC cord. 

What can you see with the Celestron NexStar 130SLT?

The Celestron NexStar 130SLT’s wide field of view and ample (although not exactly huge) aperture lend it well to viewing large deep-sky objects, such as open star clusters like M11 and M45. You’ll also have no trouble viewing the Orion Nebula or the Swan, resolving a few stars in bright globular clusters, and spotting a few planetary nebulae like the Ring and Dumbbell. Most galaxies will remain little more than fuzzy blobs, though a few, such as M31 and M82, might show dust lanes. Keep in mind, however, that if maximum image brightness and detail are your goals, dark skies and aperture rule over all else. The 130SLT will struggle to show you much in the way of deep-sky views if you live in a city beyond the brightest star clusters. 

The NexStar 130SLT can show a fair amount of detail on the Moon and planets, provided it’s collimated, though the 65x that the stock 10mm eyepiece can provide isn’t exactly going to be jaw-dropping. With a more powerful eyepiece (albeit not too powerful – remember, magnification isn’t everything), you’ll have no trouble spotting the cloud belts on Jupiter, the Cassini division in Saturn’s rings, and albedo features on Mars. Venus and Mercury’s phases, along with the moons of Jupiter and Saturn, can also be seen. And, of course, you’ll love viewing the moon. Uranus and Neptune are easy to locate with the NexStar 130SLT’s GoTo system but will remain bluish-blurry dots at best and starlike points at worst.

Astrophotography with the NexStar 130SLT

The 130SLT’s mount does track, but not accurate enough for serious deep-sky astrophotography – and the short focal length of the scope itself doesn’t lend itself well to planetary imaging. A 5x Barlow and a planetary camera will allow you to shoot Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and the Moon at a good sampling size, but it’s a bit of an unwieldy set up and there are better telescopes for the job if planetary astrophotography is primarily your goal.

Aperture:130mm
Optical Design:Newtonian Reflector
Mount Design:Motorized Alt-Azimuth
Focal Length:650mm
Focal Ratio:f/5
Focuser:2" Single Speed Rack & Pinion
Fully Assembled Weight:18 lbs
Warranty:Celestron 2 Years

13 thoughts on “Celestron NexStar 130SLT Review: Partially Recommended”

    • The StarNavigator NG scopes are actually less well-built than the NexStar SLTs, and I would hesitate to recommend either.

      Reply
  1. I have found it to be a decent scope for most types of viewing, but I agree on the shakiness, the power consumption and the GoTo tech being too complicated. Having to enter the date and time every time, really?! I do like the sturdiness and quality of the tripod, but I am really disappointed with some of the plastic parts such as the main battery cover, the end cap and the finderscope battery cover. They look and feel cheap.
    Replacing the battery on the finderscope is very difficult, mainly because of the plastic cover. The end cap doesn’t fit very well and kept popping off. I had to resort to lining the inside rim of the cap with electrical tape. Also agree with mount issues.
    3 star rating at the most.

    Reply
  2. HI Zane,

    I liked your blog and the fact that you have logical yes or no for specific requirement.

    I want to buy telescope in the range of 300-400 to see planetary moons and if possible some binary stars. I need it computerized.

    Please advise.

    Thanks

    Reply
  3. Hi,

    My wife is an artist and her current focus is astronomy. I want to buy her a computerized telescope with tripod and ability to take sharp pictures on the smart phone or captured on a portable media under $400. I see a lot of good reviews by you that pertain to table-top telescopes. I was first focused on Celestron lines (114LCM, Astro 130 and SLT 130). Now I am a bit confused as what would be the best option.

    Thanks

    Reply
    • Why do you need a tripod?

      As far as under $400 – a 6″ or 8″ Dobsonian or one of the Celestron Astro-Fi scopes is probably best.

      Reply
  4. Been using the SLT for 2 years.
    Yep the mount is shaky but you can mitigate some of this by tightening up the bolts a bit on the mount and the fork clutch may need a bit of a tighten. Put a weight on the leg spreader tray. Also don’t extend the legs further than you need. Collimating using a cheap laser Collimating tool is a breeze once you have done it a couple of times. I do mine in a few mins every time I setup. Plenty of vids on utube cover this. It does take about 7 seconds to settle down after you use the focuser and can be a bit of a pain getting sharp focus, But that not just the SLT. A lot of single arm mounts suffer the same issue. I have fitted a cheap Orion electric focuser on mine which has helped a lot. I would not recommend using the battery option on this. Use a cheap power adaptor off of Amazon look for the correct amps and voltage. I been using an old one off of my old music keyboard since I got the scope. A car battery will be a good option for this scope. No need to go for an expensive deep cycle leisure battery if you’re just using the mount. A car battery will last long enough for a good night viewing. Check out some of the Astronomer websites lots of people use them or the car jumpstart power packs.
    I’m not too keen on the Celestron hand controller its hard to make the letters out in the dark. You can control the brightness of the red light behind the buttons but that isn’t the issue for me. It more about the contrast of black letters against red light that’s the issue.
    Yes you can put a camera on this you just need to get a T adapter. Max 20 to 30 second exposure time I’m afraid. But that the same for all Alt Az mounts.
    You can use a web cam conversion plenty of vids on utube again, You will need to use a Barlow Lens to achieve focus,
    I used to struggle with alignment a lot but I have it down to a tee now.
    Remember to use the bubble level on the mount to level the mount up.
    Align the red dot finder in the day time.
    Use a low powered eye piece to align the scope.
    We Brits have to remember that we set dates by DD/MM/YY but the hand controller does it the US way MM/DD/YY.
    I’m starting to outgrow mine now but I have added a couple of things to my kit that I can carry over to a new Celestron Scope.
    2-inch-wide field 24mm eye piece. Yes, this scope can take 2-inch eye pieces and that little extra weight helps with vibration.
    Celestron wireless dongle so I don’t need to use the hand controller. Use the free sky portal android app to control the scope. I get perfect alignment using this.
    All in all, I’ve had a lot of pleasure using the SLT 130 and I would consider it a good scope for the beginner or someone who may not be ready for the cost of a better setup.
    This is an expensive hobby to take up so check out prices carefully. You can only use the scope when its not cloudy.
    Hope this helps and Dark Skies
    PS those in the UK if your looking for a 130 SLT try giving COSTCO a try. Under £300 with a free plossel eye piece kit to help get you going

    Reply
    • Hey Lee, I’ve been struggling to view planets with this scope but I’m only at this hobby for a few months now. The only thing I can successfully view is the moon so far. When I try to view Mars, I see the outline of the secondary mirror obstructing the view of the planet. (I understand Mars is not the best planet to be viewing right now..but besides this fact, I can not wrap my head around how to solve this..any help would be greatly appreciated!

      Reply
      • You’re out of focus. The focuser is not used to “zoom” – if you’ve got it focused for the Moon it will remain in focus on any other target.

        Reply
  5. I keep wondering which is worse, the tripod included with the 130 SLT or a table-wobble with a 6 inch Dob in a backyard or in the field?

    Reply

Leave a Comment