315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings

Celestron’s NexStar 102SLT Review – Partially Recommended

The NexStar 102SLT would be a decent scope were it not for its wobbly mount - as such, our recommendation is to buy something else.
Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 4/5

Focuser: 3/5

Mount: 2/5

Moon & Planets: 3/5

Rich Field: 4/5

Accessories: 3/5

Ease of use: 2/5

Portability: 4/5

Value: 2/5

Read our scoring methodology here

Celestron’s NexStar 102SLT is the only refractor in the SLT lineup as of current. It’s also arguably the worst of the SLT line, as it’s probably the least well-designed and least comfortable to use scope of the lot – in no small part thanks to it being a refractor shoved on a too-small mount.

Celestron’s NexStar 102SLT

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #37 of 37 ~$700 telescopes





Celestron NexStar 102SLT


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P is a way better GoTo telescope in every way, but if you specifically need a tripod mounted refractor GoTo in the price range, Sky-Watcher StarTravel 102 AZ-GTe Refractor GoTo is a better choice.

What We Like

  • Decent optics
  • Wide field of view
  • Portable

What We Don't Like

  • Not a lot of aperture for the price
  • Mount is unstable
  • Uncomfortable to use
Partially Recommended

The 102SLT will work pretty well with some modifications and additional spending, but when good scopes are available out of the box at lower prices there are simply better options.

The Optical Quality of the Celestron NexStar 102SLT

The Celestron NexStar 102SLT is a 102mm (4”) f/6.47 achromatic refractor with a focal length of 660mm. Being a standard Fraunhofer doublet achromatic refractor with crown and flint glass lenses, the 102SLT does show chromatic aberration, or “false color,” which is worsened by the fast f/6.47 focal ratio. But otherwise, the optical quality of the scope overall is pretty good. 

The 102SLT’s dew shield is quite short, at only 3” long from the front of the lens. As a result, stray light and dew are not very well-controlled. The objective lens will fog up pretty fast on damp nights, and glare can be quite problematic, especially if you observe near a streetlight or when the moon is up. You can make your own dew shield extension out of foam or a yoga mat, or buy a more rigid aftermarket plastic unit. Either way, it will significantly improve your observing experience.

The NexStar 102SLT’s focuser is a high-quality, all-metal, 2″ rack and pinion unit. Unfortunately, using a 2” diagonal and a wide-angle eyepiece will probably make the scope too rear-heavy to balance on the SLT mount, as the scope’s dovetail plate is short and you cannot slide it very far forward in the mount saddle. The balancing issue could be solved by putting on a longer dovetail bar and/or tube rings, but that would be problematic with the already-wobbly NexStar SLT mount.

Accessories with the 102SLT

The Celestron NexStar 102SLT comes with a StarPointer red dot finder, a 1.25” prism star diagonal, and two eyepieces: a 25mm Kellner (26x) and a 9mm Kellner (73x). Both Kellner eyepieces are mostly plastic but of decent enough quality to get you started.

A 1.25” prism diagonal is supplied with the 102SLT.

The StarPointer is the same red dot finder supplied with most inexpensive telescopes these days. While not satisfactory for star-hopping with a Dobsonian, it is just fine for its sole purpose on the SLT: aligning the GoTo system.

The Mediocre Go-To Mount

The Celestron NexStar 102SLT comes with the same Star Locating Telescope mount that all of the other SLT telescopes use—the same chassis and motors are used for Celestron’s NexStar GT, SkyProdigy, and AstroFi telescopes.

The SLT mount is lightweight, using thin steel legs for the tripod. It is not what we would call stable. This is especially true for the 102mm refractor optical tube, which is longer than any of the other telescopes on the SLT mount. Because of this, the tripod legs have to be extended further, which makes the tripod less stable and creates more of a moment arm with a longer (but not very heavy) tube. With the tripod legs extended, the tripod assembly easily twists and buckles and can be knocked over by a strong breeze or an impatient child. So, it’s hard to aim or focus the 102SLT at high magnifications, and it’s unlikely that the computer alignment will stay accurate for the whole night. You could fill the legs with sand, spray foam, or pebbles, and put a brick or rock on the accessory tray to try to increase stability, but filling the legs is inconvenient and time-consuming, and ultimately may not be that effective. As a result, using the 102SLT is a frustrating experience if for no other reason than keeping it pointed at something without shaking is a difficult task.

The database on the SLT scopes is variably mentioned as having either 4,000 or 40,000 deep-sky objects in its catalog. Regardless of which it actually has, there are probably a few hundred deep-sky objects that are interesting to observe with the 102SLT.

The SLT mount is powered by 8 AA batteries, which you put into a simple pack attached to a tripod leg, which plugs into a DC power jack on the side of the mount head. 

As is typical with all of Celestron’s computerized telescopes, their SkyAlign auto-alignment feature never actually works – it requires perfect time/date/location settings and perfect leveling of the tripod, a combination you are unlikely to ever achieve. Use Auto Two-Star Alignment – it’s almost as easy. Keep in mind that the time and date must be entered every time the scope is powered up, and changing locations is a bit of a hassle.

Should I buy a Used NexStar 102SLT?

Given the Celestron NexStar 102SLT’s mediocre optics and low-quality mount, I think it’s probably not a good idea to buy one, whether new or used.

Alternative Recommendations

The Celestron NexStar 102SLT’s large amount of chromatic aberration, shaky mount, and questionable mechanical design – combined with its high price and the futility of a GoTo mount for a small, wide-field scope – mean that it certainly isn’t the best option you could choose from at this price. Here are a few other scopes we recommend in its stead.

Under $700

  • The Apertura AD8/Zhumell Z8/Orion SkyLine 8 has double the resolving power of the NexStar 102SLT, four times as much light gathering power, and optics free of chromatic aberration mounted atop a rock-solid and easy-to-aim Dobsonian base. The included accessories such as a 2” wide-angle eyepiece and 9×50 finder are of high quality and a built-in 2” dual-speed Crayford focuser and cooling fan are standard.
  • The Explore Scientific 10” Hybrid Dobsonian provides more than 2.5x the resolving power and 6.25x the light gathering ability of the little NexStar 102SLT, and its buttery smooth, sturdy, and easy-to-use Dobsonian mount makes finding objects in the night sky a breeze. When dismantled, the 10” Hybrid rivals the 102SLT in portability and takes up fairly little volume in a closet, vehicle, or other storage space.
  • The Orion SkyQuest XT8, as with the AD8/Z8 and similar 8” Dobsonians, features double the resolution and 4 times as much light collecting area as the NexStar 102SLT thanks to its large 8” diameter primary mirror. The XT8 has a 2” Crayford focuser and provides great views, though it’s a little sparse on included accessories.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P offers double the light gathering ability and 50% more resolving power than the NexStar 102SLT (though in practice, resolution is even better thanks to the 150P’s lack of chromatic aberration). The Virtuoso GTi 150P features fully motorized GoTo and tracking like the 102SLT, but it can be aimed manually and the mount is controlled via your smartphone or tablet. The Virtuoso GTi 150P’s compact form factor thanks to its collapsible tube and tabletop Dobsonian mount make it easy to store and transport and takes seconds to set up. The manual Sky-Watcher Heritage 150P is identical to the Virtuoso GTi 150P apart from lacking the GTi electronics in its mount.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 130P features 63% more light gathering power and 25% more resolving power, free of chromatic aberration, in a GoTo tabletop instrument with the same focal length and thus super-wide field of the NexStar 102SLT. As with the Virtuoso GTi 150P, setting up the GTi 130P takes seconds and the scope can be controlled via your smartphone or tablet, or just aimed manually. A manual version of the GTi 130P, the Heritage 130P, is also available at a much lower price tag.
  • The Celestron Astro-Fi 130 shares the optics of the Virtuoso GTi 130P, being a 130mm f/5 Newtonian reflector, but is mounted atop an upgraded version of the NexStar SLT mount with thicker tripod legs and controlled via your smartphone or tablet instead of the SLT mount’s clunky and outdated hand controller keypad. The Astro-Fi 130 is probably our favorite alternative to the NexStar 102SLT if you must have a tripod.
  • The Celestron Astro-Fi 102 offers slightly less light gathering power than the NexStar 102SLT and is less suitable for deep-sky viewing, but its sharp Maksutov-Cassegrain optics deliver superior views of smaller targets such as planets and double stars thanks to its lack of chromatic aberration, and the Astro-Fi mount is sturdier and more advanced than the outdated NexStar SLT mount and its spindly steel tripod.


  • The Apertura AD10/Zhumell Z10/Orion SkyLine 10 features 2.5x the resolution and 6.25 times as much light gathering power as the NexStar 102SLT, mounted atop a sturdy Dobsonian mount and with the same great features and accessories as the 8” model. Compared to the AD8/Z8 you’re only adding a few pounds of weight and a negligible gain in length/width, so if you can afford a 10” Dob we’d heartily recommend one, particularly the AD10/Z10, over an 8” unit.
  • The Celestron StarSense Explorer 8” Dobsonian is lighter and easier to transport than most other solid-tubed 8” Dobsonians thanks to its trimmed, weight-optimized base with cutouts and the handles attached to the optical tube for an easy lift. You also get Celestron’s StarSense Explorer technology to assist you in navigating the night sky using your smartphone mounted atop the telescope tube. The included accessories are, however, a little sparse, especially for the price, and you only get 8” of aperture and a single-speed 2” Crayford focuser.
  • The Sky-Watcher 8” FlexTube Dobsonian takes up less space than a standard 8” or 10” Dobsonian when dismantled, so it’s good for those who put portability at a premium (though not as compact as the true trusses offered by other manufacturers like Explore Scientific). As with any 8” Dob, it blows away the NexStar 102SLT in light gathering power, resolution and overall sharpness. The included pair of eyepieces and 9×50 finder scope are decent enough. However, the Dobsonian base on this scope is not as well-designed and quite heavy compared to the competition, the open tube needs a shroud, a screwdriver is required for collimating this scope, and there’s no weight savings compared to a regular 8”.

What can you see with the Celestron Nexstar 102SLT?

Being a 4” refractor, the 102SLT has enough aperture to show a fair number of nebulae, star clusters, and galaxies. However, the wide field of view means that the GoTo system is kind of unnecessary to find many of them. Furthermore, you can’t move the scope manually, and half the fun of a wide-field refractor is panning around the Milky Way and star fields, which you can’t really do with this telescope. Globular clusters will lack resolution, while most galaxies are too dim to see with the 102SLT’s small aperture, particularly under light-polluted skies. Open star clusters and large nebulae like the Veil, Swan, and Lagoon are the main treats with this telescope.

The Moon and planets look good with the 102SLT as well, provided you can get the scope to stop shaking. Jupiter’s cloud belts, Great Red Spot, and 4 brightest moons can be seen, and Saturn’s rings are visible along with a handful of moons. You might have trouble seeing much in the way of detail on Mars, even at opposition, due to the 102SLT’s chromatic aberration smearing out the planet’s red disk. Uranus and Neptune are little more than starlike dots, while Venus and Mercury’s phases are visible (albeit barely with the latter due to its small size).

Not for Astrophotography

The alt-azimuth nature and cheap gears of the SLT mount, combined with the inability to balance with heavy accessories and, of course, chromatic aberration, mean that serious astrophotography, be it deep-sky or lunar/planetary imaging, is pretty much out of the question with the NexStar 102SLT. You can have some fun shooting the Moon with a phone adapter such as Celestron’s NexYZ (which they offer bundled with the telescope), but that is about the limit of the telescope’s capabilities.

Optical Design:Doublet Refractor
Mount Design:Motorized Alt-Azimuth
Focal Length:600mm
Focal Ratio:f/6
Focuser:1.25" Rack-and-pinion
Fully Assembled Weight:14 lbs
Warranty:1 year limited

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

1 thought on “Celestron’s NexStar 102SLT Review – Partially Recommended”

  1. I have A Nesxtstar SLT 102 telescope since 2014.
    I 2018 the Verticle movement motor SLT-F00-01B had to be replaced. Next the horizontal motor SLT -F00-01B has stopped working .This motor needs to be replaced.My several e mail to Celestron Support remains unanswered as to how can I solve this problem. I need the motor to recommission my telescopeforvwhich I need the source from whom I can procure the motor through my friends in US.Can anyoine help?


Leave a Comment