315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings

Orion SkyQuest XT8 Review: Recommended Scope

While the base Orion SkyQuest XT8 is somewhat accessory-poor, it surrenders nothing to more expensive 8” telescopes.
Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 5/5

Focuser: 4/5

Mount: 4/5

Moon & Planets: 5/5

Rich Field: 5/5

Accessories: 3/5

Ease of use: 5/5

Portability: 3/5

Value: 4/5

Read our scoring methodology here

If you’ve been into astronomy any time in the past 20 years, you’ve probably heard of the Orion SkyQuest XT8. If you’re new to the hobby, it’s probably already been recommended to you as a good first telescope. And it very much is – if perhaps a little lacking in accessories and a little expensive compared to some other offerings. 

Orion SkyQuest XT8

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #8 of 37 ~$700 Telescopes





Orion SkyQuest XT8


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Apertura AD8 Dobsonian; it's not only the just the best valued 8" dobsonian, but the best-valued telescope overall!

What We Like

  • Large aperture for a low price
  • Decent optics and mechanics
  • Very good single-speed Crayford focuser
  • Fairly portable
  • Spring tensioning system for balancing

What We Don't Like

  • Needs more eyepieces to be utilized to its full potential
  • Red dot finder is of extremely limited utility
  • Other 8” Dobsonians in price range offer more accessories
Recommended Product Badge

The XT8 is a great telescope, but you will need to go shopping for some additional eyepieces and probably a better finderscope to get views that you’ll be happy with. But with that money, you could good a vastly superior 8″ dobsonian such as Apertura AD8.

The Optical Tube

Orion Skyquest XT8 in a room
Photo by Zane Landers

The XT8 is an 8” (actually 205mm or 8.1”) f/5.9 Newtonian reflector with a focal length of 1220mm, a fairly simple design. The primary mirror is made of plate glass. Like most Newtonian reflectors, the XT8’s mirrors need to be aligned (called “collimating”) fairly often, but not every time the telescope is used. This is a relatively easy procedure and not something to be afraid of.

The focuser on the XT8 is a high-quality, single-speed 2” Crayford focuser. There is not a single plastic component to it. The newest versions of the XT8 have added a brass compression ring to the focuser and its 1.25” adapter, an improvement over the older thumb screw design, which tended to leave marks on eyepieces and accessories. The 1.25” adapter also has T threads to attach a DSLR or mirrorless camera, though this isn’t very useful given that the XT8 isn’t designed for long-exposure astrophotography and a smartphone is better for taking pictures of the Moon and planets.

The tube of the XT8 is about 48” (1.2 m) long, and as such, fits across the back seat of most vehicles.

SkyQuest XT8 Accessories

The XT8 comes with a single eyepiece – a 25mm Plossl providing 48x magnification. It’s not a bad eyepiece, but you’ll of course want additional eyepieces for higher and lower magnifications, particularly for good views of the Moon and planets. A smartphone adapter for taking simple shots of the Moon and planets is also included, and it clamps onto most 1.25” eyepieces.

The XT8’s finderscope is a simple red dot sight. A finder like this is fine for a small telescope, but with a bigger scope like the SkyQuest XT8, you might want a reflex sight like the Telrad, or a right-angle, correct-image magnifying finderscope – essentially a mini telescope itself – such as a 9×50 design.

The XT8 Mount

The SkyQuest XT8 is a Dobsonian telescope, which pivots up-down and left-right on Teflon pads. There are no locks, clutches, gears, or knobs to turn. You just push and pull the scope around the sky. Even at high magnifications, this is surprisingly easy to do, and the silky-smooth motions of the telescope make tracking and aiming the scope a breeze.

Orion 8945 SkyQuest XT8 Classic Dobsonian Telescope

The regular XT8 uses springs for tensioning the altitude bearings, which allow the scope to pivot up and down, as the telescope is prone to tipping over if it is slightly top- or bottom-heavy, due to the small bearings providing a smaller fulcrum and any imbalance making the whole tube act like a lever. This is actually quite helpful, but the springs look a little silly and are difficult to attach and remove.

Our main gripe with the SkyQuest XT8’s mount, besides the small bearings, is the fact that it is made of particleboard. If you chip the paint/veneer you will expose what is basically pressed-together sawdust, which will quickly warp and rot. Also, particleboard is incredibly heavy — the base of the Orion SkyQuest XT8 weighs a little over 20 lbs. Thankfully, if the base is damaged or simply breaks your back, you can make a new base out of ¾” plywood for relatively little money, which will weigh less and probably look better, even with modest tools and skills. Several aftermarket vendors also offer custom new bases for your SkyQuest XT8, or indeed, any commercial Dobsonian telescope.

Should I buy a used Orion SkyQuest XT8?

The XT8 has been around for 20 years, and not much has changed – older XT8s have a slightly lower quality rack-and-pinion focuser, and the oldest units only have a 1.25” focuser, so expect to pay less for one of these. But if the mirror coatings are in good shape and the base isn’t damaged, there’s not much that can go wrong with a used unit. At worst, you can always build a new base out of plywood for a relatively low cost.

Alternative Recommendations

The Orion SkyQuest XT8 doesn’t come with a lot of accessories or features for the money compared to “deluxe” Dobsonians which hardly cost much more, but it’s a perfectly fine scope. However, here are some of our top alternative picks.

Under $700

  • The Apertura AD8/Zhumell Z8/Orion SkyLine 8 includes a lot more features and accessories than the XT8, such as a 9×50 instead of a red dot finder, two eyepieces, and even a built-in dual-speed Crayford focuser and cooling fans. Upgrading the XT8 to include all of these features would cost several hundred dollars, which is a massive jump compared to the price of just getting the AD8/Z8.
  • The Explore Scientific 10” Hybrid Dobsonian outperforms an 8” Dob like the XT8 by a large margin, but includes a similarly bare-bones set of accessories and features like the XT8 with the added requirements of a shroud and requiring assembly of the truss tubes before use.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P has less light gathering or resolving power than the XT8, but comes in an ultra-compact and portable package that fits in a suitcase or backpack. The Virtuoso GTi 150P also features full GoTo and motorized tracking features, controlled with an app on your smartphone or tablet. The manual Heritage 150P is identical to the GTi 150P apart from the lack of electronics.


  • The Apertura AD10/Zhumell Z10/Orion SkyLine 10 features the same accessories and feature upgrades as the AD8, with a dual-speed focuser and 9×50 finder being included by default along with a plethora of other accessories. The extra 2” of aperture doesn’t translate to a significant increase in weight or bulk, but will show you 56% brighter images and has 25% more resolving power.
  • The Celestron StarSense Explorer 8” Dobsonian is very similar to the XT8, with the same basic set of accessories. However, the StarSense Explorer 8” has a base with cutouts to reduce weight and uses Celestron’s StarSense Explorer technology to assist in finding objects in the night sky using your smartphone piggybacked on top of a special-purpose bracket on the scope.
  • The Sky-Watcher 8” FlexTube Dobsonian has the same optics as the XT8 and feature-wise is similar other than the inclusion of a 9×50 finder in lieu of a red dot and the addition of a 10mm eyepiece (120x) to the mix. The collapsible tube is its hallmark feature and allows the scope to take up slightly less storage space, at the expense of requiring a shroud and more frequent collimation. The altitude bearing design is also noticeably inferior to the XT8 or AD8.

What can you see with XT8?

The XT8 can show you a lot, especially under clear and dark skies. However, no matter where you are, the Moon and planets will be fabulous. Tiny lunar details just a few miles across, like craters, ridges, and volcanoes known as lunar domes, can be seen on a steady night, as can the phases of Mercury and Venus. On Mars, the XT8 will show up to a dozen or so features to the trained eye when Mars is close to Earth. Jupiter’s cloud bands show lots of festoons and swirls. The Galilean moons of Jupiter are no longer mere pinpoints but tiny disks, with hints of color. Saturn shows several moons and intricate cloud bands, along with the Cassini and possibly Encke divisions. Uranus and Neptune are merely bluish-green dots, though you might be able to spot Neptune’s largest moon, Triton.

The quality of many deep-sky objects you view with the SkyQuest XT8, or any telescope, will be heavily dependent on the light pollution you live under. Galaxies under dark skies look fabulous with the XT8 – you’ll have no trouble spotting the spiral arms of M51 and M33, the H-II regions of M82 and M101, and all sorts of dust lanes and details in several hundred of the brightest galaxies. But under light-polluted skies, the faint details and sometimes whole galaxies themselves will completely vanish from view. Many large, bright nebulae are similarly affected. Open star clusters and globular star clusters, as well as smaller planetary nebulae, aren’t as affected by light pollution. Even from the suburbs, you’ll have no trouble resolving many of the globular clusters like M13 and M15 into individual stars, and open star clusters are still majestic and colorful. 

Optical Design:Newtonian Reflector
Mount Design:Altazimuth
Focal Length:1200mm
Focal Ratio:f/5.9
Focuser:2" Crayford
Fully Assembled Weight:41 lbs
Warranty:1 year limited

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

21 thoughts on “Orion SkyQuest XT8 Review: Recommended Scope”

  1. Hi! Total newbie here! I bought an XT8 per your recommendation. I see your recommendation to buy a gold-line, but I have no idea which one you’re referring to and honestly can’t figure out what all of this means. I just want to show my kids Saturn’s rings, and maybe just maybe figure out on my own how to see something in deep space! Can you please let me know which gold-line you recommend with the XT8 for higher power?
    Thank you for providing this website!! It is amazing.

  2. Zane, your newbie is back and a proud new owner of an XT8! A few ridiculous questions:

    1. All objects look yellow. How do I get color?
    2. Saturn doesn’t look much different than I remember it in my Celestron 76eq when I was a kid. This scope is 3x to 4x the price, so I was hoping for more – it’s kind of small.. Is it that I need more eyepieces to make Saturn look even bigger? If so, which ones do you recommend? (please link!)
    3. How big of a difference will it make if I drive 20-30 minutes outside of town?
    4. As ridiculous as this may sound, is any other than the sun dangerous [for your eyes] to look at through the scope?

    Thanks again!

    • 1. Not sure what you’re referring to. Jupiter and Saturn are mostly yellow. Most deep-sky objects are too dim for your cones to detect color and just look gray.

      2. You need more eyepieces besides the stock 25mm. Check out our eyepiece guides.

      3. Depends on where you live. For planets, zero. For deep-sky objects, a lot.

      4. No

  3. It seems everything is great about this scope, except the accessories. Would you recommend configuring our own set from Orion’s build-a-scope website?


    If so, what would you recommend in terms of a finder scope, focuser, and filters? For eyepieces, I’ll go gold-lines, based on your input there (thanks).

      • HI Zane
        I see both Apertura and Zhumell are severely backordered by the seller High Point Scientetic. that apparently leaves most with XT8 as the choice. are there any other alternatives to XT8? Other than the accessories, is there fundamentally wrong with XT optically?

  4. Please help!! Assuming equal price, which should I pick: XT8 or Skywatcher 8″ Dobsonian?

    Unfortunately, the Zhummel Z8/Apertura AD8 are not sold in Europe it seems…

    Thank you for this great review and website by the way!

  5. Hi Zane, I have recently ordered the Orion XT8 and was wondering what additional eyepieces I should buy. I’d like to enhance my viewing of nebulae so any suggestions on how I can do this as I am brand new? I’ve received advice to say if I get a 2″ eyepiece and a filter this would be optimal but I’m not sure where to start at all with the best options for this. Many thanks, Sophie

    • I would get a 30mm or 42mm Superview, 6mm and 9mm goldlines, and a 2″ UHC filter like the Orion Ultrablock

      • Hi Zane, thanks for your reply. Do you have a link to the superview you mean as quite a few come up when I research this and not sure what is right one. Also it is worth mentioning since writing my comment I stumbled across the page on eyepieces on here and am now considering the celestron zoom or Baader hyperion zoom eyepiece. Would I still need to add more eyepieces if I got a zoom do you think for optimum range? Also with filters can 2″ filters be used with 1.25 eyepieces or do you have to get filters to fit specific eyepiece size? Sorry for any stupid questions I am totally new to this 🙂 thanks

  6. Hello. I’m thinking on buying an XT8 but I live in Mexico and there is not a lot of options regarding accessories. I found this Orion set but I dont know if it is worthwhile or if it is better to buy some of the individual eyepieces you mentioned. This is what the set contains (all in 1.25″):

    5 Sirius Plossl telescope eyepieces – 40mm, 17mm, 10mm, 7.5mm, and 6.3mm
    6 eyepiece filters – 5 color planetary filters and a 13% transmission neutral-density Moon filter
    A Shorty 2x Barlow lens


  7. Hi, I live in a town which suffers from a fairly high light pollution (orange/red zone, 5th/6th class according to the Bortle scale) and has more LED street lights than the sodium ones, so the LP filter would not be much use. Most of my observing time is going to be spent in a backyard or a roof of my house, so I’ll have to deal with the light pollution most of the time, but I’ll be able to escape the light polluted area several times a year. So would You still recommend 8 inch dob over 6 inch, if the major part of my observing time is going to be spent in the light polluted area? I have no problem with affording the 8 inch, but I just want to know if it’s still worth the additional money I’ll pay for it compared to the 6 inch dob. Thank You

  8. If I buy the Orion SkyQuest XT8 , because of the weights, I may need to detach the base and then reattach when trying to move the telescope from house to deck . Are the springs difficult to detach and then reattach ?

    And it seems to come with one eyepiece, which other eyepiece should I buy ?
    Thank you.

    • The springs are easy to attach. I would start with at least a 9mm redline/goldline eyepiece for high power.

  9. Hi. I really like the site in general, but I’m struggling to understand some of the comments some times…

    On the review of the Apertura AD8, you mention that the finder is ok, can be a bit confusing etc and that “a red dot finder is easier to use”.

    Now on this review, you say: “Red dot finder is of extremely limited utility”

    WTH..? Really hard to understand these contradictions?

    • Not all red dot finders/reflex sights are equal, and generally a red dot is easier to use but not as *capable* as a RACI. Generally a reflex sight or some combination of multiple finders is best for midsize scopes like an 8″ Dob


Leave a Comment