315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings

Sky-Watcher 8″ Dobsonian Review – Editor’s Choice

Sky-Watcher’s 8” Traditional is simple, offers views simply never before possible at its price range, and gives you excellent bang for your buck.
Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 5/5

Focuser: 4/5

Mount: 4/5

Moon & Planets: 5/5

Rich Field: 5/5

Accessories: 4/5

Ease of use: 5/5

Portability: 3/5

Value: 4/5

Read our scoring methodology here

The Sky-Watcher 8” Traditional offers a good value as a 8” Dobsonian on the market in the US. It’s great for beginners and experienced users alike, with all the accessories needed to get you observing right out of the box.

Sky-Watcher 8" Dobsonian

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #9 of 37 ~$700 telescopes





Skywatcher 8" Classic Dob


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Apertura AD8 Dobsonian

What We Like

  • Cheapest 8” Dobsonian available and best value
  • Comes with more than 1 eyepiece
  • Fast setup time
  • Large aperture without being too bulky

What We Don't Like

  • Weird focuser adapters
  • Finderscope is uncomfortable to use
  • Tensioning knobs stick out from the sides
  • Balance with heavy eyepieces can be troublesome
TelescopicWatch Editor's Choice

While there are one or two 8” Dobsonians with extra accoutrements that we might recommend over the Sky-Watcher Classic 200 Dobsonian, none deliver the same great combination of value and low price. If you’re on a budget and would rather save additional spending on accessories for later, the Sky-Watcher 8” Traditional is your friend. Else, there is always the Apertura AD8.

The Optical Tube In 8″ Traditional

Optical Tube of Skywatcher 8" Dob

The 8” Traditional, or the Skywatcher Classic 200p, is an 8” f/5.9 Newtonian, manufactured by Suzhou Synta Optical Technologies—the same company that owns Celestron and manufactures Orion’s XT and XX Dobsonians. The mirrors are made of borosilicate glass (Pyrex), which expands far less with expansion and contraction than plate glass. Quality-wise, they tend to be good.

At f/5.9, there isn’t any coma like there is with faster scopes such as Sky-Watcher’s 10” and larger models, which have to have faster focal ratios to avoid being cumbersome and (at the largest sizes), requiring a tall ladder.

The 8” Traditional’s tube is identical in length to Sky-Watcher and other manufacturers’ 6” f/8 Dobsonians. As a result, it is not really any more cumbersome to transport or more difficult to store. I really like solid tubes for 8ʺ Dobs or larger. A 10ʺ scope becomes a bit uncomfortable to wrap your arms around, and a 12ʺ or larger is a nightmare to handle, unless you are built like Paul Bunyan.

The Focuser of Skywatcher Classic 200 Dobsonian

The focuser on the Sky-Watcher 8” Dobsonian is a rack-and-pinion. It works just as well as a Crayford unit, but there are two issues I have with it. First, the knobs are hard plastic with little ridges that dig into your fingers. Second, the focuser comes with a strange thread-on 1.25” adapter and a thread-on 2” adapter, which means that unless you spend additional money on a separate 1.25” to 2” adapter, you’ll be fumbling around in the dark with these silly adapters. I don’t get why Sky-Watcher elected to add this system rather than just supplying the 2” adapter and a 1.25” to 2” adapter.

Reviewing the Accessories

Skywatcher 8 Inch Dobsonian's Eyepieces and Accessories

The 8” Traditional comes with 25mm (48x) and 10mm (120x) “Super” eyepieces that seem to be Plossls. They work well, but you’ll want some additional 6mm and 9mm “gold-line” eyepieces at the minimum for high power (the 10mm Super is a little short on eye relief), and a 2” wide-angle eyepiece to get the maximum possible field of view at low power for expansive views of nebulae, star clusters, and other deep-sky objects.

The 8” Traditional comes with a 9x50mm straight-through finderscope. In addition to being uncomfortable to aim through at almost every angle, the finder’s images are inverted. A Telrad is far easier to use, and a 50mm right-angle finder will also work well and do wonders for your neck.

About the Dobsonian Mount in Skywatcher 8″ Dob

Like all other Chinese-made Dobsonians, the Skywatcher Classic 200P Dob’s mount is made of melamine-covered particle board, which is basically sawdust compressed with glue and is a cheaper version of the stuff your IKEA furniture is sometimes made out of. It’s heavy compared to plywood, and if the melamine is damaged, even slight moisture (i.e., being used in grass) will warp it.

Unlike Orion’s XT Dobsonians, which use springs for altitude tensioning and have the altitude bearings sit in cutouts in the mount, the Sky-Watcher Classic Dobsonians have the altitude bearings sit on brackets inside the rocker sides.

Altitude tensioning is provided by two handles that stick out from the rocker (basically bicycle grips). This system works well, but the handles can get caught on things such as loose clothing, especially in the dark.

The scope’s motions are pretty smooth, but the azimuth motion can be improved by replacing the cheap Nylon pads with real Teflon pads (available from various vendors on eBay and some hardware stores) and nailing a sheet of Formica onto the azimuth board. Due to the design of the altitude bearings, I would not recommend tampering with them.

The mount comes with a handle and an eyepiece tray—nice conveniences, but I don’t recommend using the latter as it’s a good way to get your eyepieces damaged/dewed up/dirty.

What All Can You See with SkyWatcher Classic 200P?

Skywatcher 200P in room
Pic by Zane Landers

I’ve always found the Moon to look good in any scope, but particularly so in an 8″, which seems to be a good general size for lunar observation – you have decent resolution, but the Moon isn’t blinding at sane magnifications. Clavius can show three or four dozen craterlets, provided there is good seeing and collimation.

Jupiter’s moons are nice disks with an 8” and show some amount of color, particularly Io, which is a ruddy orange-yellow. Jupiter itself shows many festoons, cloud belts, and, of course, the Great Red Spot.

Saturn shows several bands—currently it has three major ones—as well as the Cassini Division in its rings and several moons. Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, is a gold color, but it falls short of being a disk with anything less than perfect seeing conditions.

Uranus’ moons can hypothetically be glimpsed with an 8”, but I’ve never done it in practice. Neptune is a nice azure disk, and Triton can be seen with some effort.

Outside the solar system, 8” of aperture is enough to show you the entire Messier catalog, though a few galaxies like M74 and M83 may be difficult to see if you suffer from light pollution. The famous Whirlpool Galaxy can just show a hint of spiral arms from a dark site, and its companion M51B/NGC 5195 is pretty easy to see. M81 and M82 in Ursa Major are quite interesting. In the spring, the Virgo Cluster becomes a bit crowded with galaxies, and in the autumn, several smaller galaxy clusters may show at least one or two bright members with some effort.

Globular star clusters with an 8” actually start to show resolution. M2, M3, M5, M13, M15, and M92 in particular tend to show a fair amount of stars sprinkled across with an 8”, while M4 may yield fantastic views if you don’t live too far north and don’t have much light pollution to the south of you. Even the dimmer Messier globulars like M10, M12, and M79 can show hints of resolution with practice.

Many planetary nebulae besides the Ring and Dumbbell are interesting to investigate with an 8” (particularly with a light pollution or oxygen-III filter), such as NGC 1535 in Eridanus and the Eskimo Nebula in Gemini in the winter, and the Blinking Planetary Nebula and NGC 7027 in Cygnus in the summer.

Alternative Recommendations

While I like many aspects of the Sky-Watcher 8” Classic, it’s not my top pick in its price range, mainly because of its single-speed Crayford focuser and the less-than-ideal design of the altitude bearings; however, it is still a great scope. For your convenience, here are some alternatives around and above its price range that you might want to consider:

Under $700

  • The Apertura AD8/Zhumell Z8/Orion SkyLine 8 offers a significantly improved 2” dual-speed Crayford focuser with a compression ring, a more comfortable right-angle correct image 9×50 finder, a built-in cooling fan, slightly better bearings that can be adjusted for balance, and a 2” low-power, wide-angle 30mm eyepiece instead of a 1.25” 25mm Plossl or wide-angle design.
  • The Explore Scientific 10” Hybrid Dobsonian offers more aperture, and thus more light-gathering and resolving power, than an 8” Dobsonian like the Classic or AD8, but requires a significant upfront investment in new accessories and some DIY modifications to perform well. 
  • The Orion SkyQuest XT8 is very similar to the 8” Classic but lacks the Classic’s extra eyepiece or 9×50 finder. However, the bearings are more well-designed and the Crayford focuser has a compression ring as well as not requiring an annoying extension tube to reach focus with most eyepieces.
  • The Sky-Watcher Virtuoso GTi 150P is smaller than the 8” Classic but features an ultra-compact collapsible tube and full motorized GoTo and tracking along with the same excellent pair of 1.25” Super eyepieces. You can use it manually with or without the GoTo functionality, or purchase the cheaper Heritage 150P in lieu of the GTi, which is identical apart from the lack of electronics.


  • The Apertura AD10/Zhumell Z10/Orion SkyLine 10 offers more aperture than the 8” Classic with significantly more bang for your buck, not only in the form of the larger primary mirror diameter but also with a dual-speed focuser, cooling fan, 2” 30mm SuperView wide-angle eyepiece, right-angle 9×50 finder scope, and a laser collimator included.
  • The Celestron StarSense Explorer 8” Dobsonian is similar in design to the 8” Classic but features a lightweight base, a better included 1.25” adapter, and Celestron’s award-winning StarSense Explorer technology to help with locating objects in the night sky such as star clusters, nebulae, and galaxies via your smartphone.
  • The Sky-Watcher 8” FlexTube Dobsonian is essentially identical to the 8” Classic, apart from its collapsible tube which reduces its length when stored and transported. This is helpful if you have a small vehicle or very little storage space, but there are some disadvantages from the open tube (such as the need for a shroud to block out stray light) and no weight savings, plus the same drawbacks of the 8” Classic’s design and accessories.

Aftermarket Accessory Recommendations

The #1 accessory we’d recommend for the SkyWatcher Classic 200P are extra eyepieces. Specifically, a 2” wide-angle eyepiece such as the GSO 30mm SuperView and a high-power eyepiece such as a 6mm goldline or a 5.5mm Meade UWA. The wide-angle 2” eyepiece will make it easier to find objects and provide a sweeping vista that’s great for the largest star clusters and nebulae, while either of the latter eyepieces will provide great close-up views of the Moon, planets, double stars, and globular star clusters.

Additionally, a Telrad or Rigel Quikfinder is a great supplement or replacement for the included 9×50 finder on the telescope.

Optical Design:Newtonian Reflector
Mount Design:Altazimuth
Focal Length:1200mm
Focal Ratio:f/5.9
Focuser:2" Single Speed Crayford
Fully Assembled Weight:45 lbs
Warranty:Sky-Watcher 2 Year Limited

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

21 thoughts on “Sky-Watcher 8″ Dobsonian Review – Editor’s Choice”

  1. If you could only buy 2 additional mid-range eyepieces for this scope, which 2 would they be? I don’t have the budget for a full set of eyepieces… so I just want 2 to go with the basic ones that come with the scope. I want to maximise the magnification capabilities but also give myself a nice wide view. Is this possible with only 2 additional EPs?

  2. Hi Zane, I am a first time user of Telescopes. Which would be a better option the 6 or the 8 of the Sky-Watcher Dobsonian ? I am in Ontario and I am getting the 6 for 485 CAD inclusive of taxes and the 8 for 680. For a additional $200 is it worth it or you recommend going with the 6. with $200 that I save I could go for some eyepieces for the scope with your suggestion. Your answer to my query would be greatly appreciated.

    Cheers !!!

    • The regular version holds collimation better, but the functionality of the two scopes is basically the same

  3. Hi Zane what are suggestions for using a SVBONY SV135 Telescope Eyepiece Zoom 7 to 21mm 1.25 Inch Fully multi Coated 6 Element 4 Group for Astronomic Telescopes on this telescope.
    What do you mean when you say “You’ll also probably want a 2ʺ wide-eyepiece” are you referring to a Barlow lens?


      • Rats, posted earlier in the wrong place.

        I’m stuck. I ordered (but can still cancel) the Meade StarNavigator Next Generation 102 mm Refractor, mainly because of the goto and audio feature. But I see here that they recommend this 8″ Dobsonian. But I think I would be frustrated trying to find anything except the moon

        Am I over thinking this? Just stick with the meade to get started?

  4. Hi Zane,

    I got the 8 inch Skywatcher Dob as you suggested. I am loving it. Got amazing shots of Jupiter and Saturn with my phone. I had a questions about collimating skywatcher 200p. I ordered the SVBONY Red Laser Collimator for Newtonian Reflector Marca Telescope Alignment 1.25 inches 7 Bright Levels Triple Cemented Lens with 2 inches Adapter from Amazon. Do I have to check every time I move the Telescope for Collimation ?

    • not speaking for Zane but as long as you don’t bang it around it should hold collimation. Wrap in quilt or blanket, if transporting in vehicle. Carry the Colimator and nessasary tools with you. I usually Give it a quick check before session especially if i thing it been bounced a bit.

      Clear Skys,


      • This is correct. The Sky-Watcher Dobs are a little more irritating to collimate than Zhumell/Apertura/GSO due to the need for a screwdriver but seem to hold it better from my experience. I’ve had three of them and I never actually had to collimate them at any point

  5. Hi Zane, It seems like the current product description for the 8″ Classic SkyWatcher Dobsonian (which I’m assuming same as the “traditional” you have reviewed here) is currently described on the Skywatcher site as having “25/10 Super (modified Kellner)” eyepieces included rather than the Plossl ones you describe in your review. How would that change your thoughts on the value of this model versus the other 8″ dobsonians?


  6. I’m thinking of buying a telescope. Which one do you think is better for viewing plantes, Celestron Nexstar 4se or a Sky Watcher Classic 200 Dobsonian 8-inch Aperature Telescope? Specifically for viewing Saturn and Jupiter.


Leave a Comment