315+ Telescopes Ranked

View Rankings

Celestron’s PowerSeeker 70AZ Reviewed – Not Recommended

Photo of author

When you read one of my reviews at TelescopicWatch, you can trust that not only have I gotten to use the product, but I’ve compared it to numerous others and tinkered with it down to the literal nuts and bolts. When I'm not writing reviews, I'm out under the night sky with my own homemade or modified telescopes, with over 7 years of hands-on experience in astronomy, having owned 430 telescopes myself, of which 20 I built entirely.

Tested by

Score Breakdown

Optics: 3/5

Focuser: 2/5

Mount: 3/5

Moon & Planets: 3/5

Rich Field: 2/5

Accessories: 2/5

Ease of use: 2/5

Portability: 4/5

Value: 1/5

Read our scoring methodology here

Celestron’s PowerSeeker 70AZ continues the grand PowerSeeker tradition of great expectations and huge letdowns. Generally, I recommend steering clear of sub-$100 telescopes, as well as sub-$200 tripod-mounted instruments, and scopes like the PowerSeekers are part of why. The 70AZ is actually one of the better PowerSeeker scopes but still falls short of delivering a really useful instrument out of the box.

Celestron’s PowerSeeker 70AZ

How It Stacks Up

Ranks #9 of 33 ~$75 telescopes





Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ


See All Telescopes' Ranklist

Best Similar Featured Alternative: Meade Infinity 70mm Altazimuth Refractor

What We Like

  • Works
  • Good optics
  • Cheap

What We Don't Like

  • Small aperture
  • Mediocre mount 
  • Poor quality accessories
Not Recommended Telescope

The Powerseeker 70AZ’s poor quality accoutrements mean it’s simply not worth the price of admission. There are several larger, superior, and much less frustrating options in its price range to choose from.

Powerseeker 70AZ Optical Tube & Quality

The Celestron PowerSeeker 70’s optical tube is shared between the EQ and AZ versions and is thus identical. It’s a 70mm f/10 achromatic refractor. The images provided by this scope are surprisingly good when coupled with decent eyepieces, which it sadly does not come with. The rack-and-pinion focuser on the scope is also acceptable in quality, being 1.25″, which will allow you to use decent eyepieces and accessories without trouble.

The inside of the scope’s dew shield is shiny, which hampers image contrast; blackening it is relatively easily accomplished, however.

Most of the parts on the OTA are plastic, but plastic doesn’t necessarily mean bad quality on its own. Celestron has done a pretty good job of keeping the parts of the scope overall metal when they need to be. However, the same cannot be said for the accessories.

The Junk Accessories

Unlike some of the other PowerSeekers, which have severely deficient mounts or bad optics, the main killer of the Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ is really its supplied accessories.

The PowerSeeker refractors all come with a 20mm Kellner eyepiece (45x), a 4mm Ramsden eyepiece (175x), and a junk 3x Barlow (the Newtonian scopes come with a 20mm erecting eyepiece instead of the 20mm Kellner). The 20mm Kellner is decent, but 45x is simply too much magnification for a 70mm telescope’s low power eyepiece. The 4mm Ramsden already provides too much magnification for 70mm of aperture, and its narrow field of view and low quality don’t help. The 3x barlow is entirely plastic and is utterly useless as anything more than a dust cap.

The included diagonal is an Amici design, shaped like a handle after Celestron noticed that people tend to grab the diagonal as such during product testing. It works fine and presents correct left-right and up-down images for terrestrial viewing. However, this is not really useful for astronomical viewing and the Amici prism absorbs light, making for a dimmer image at the eyepiece.

The 5×24 finderscope on the Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ is also near-useless, being made entirely of plastic with a dim, narrow field of view and a bracket that is all-but-impossible to use to align the finder.

Unfortunately, by the time you replace all these accessories, you will have spent as much as, if not more than, the cost of the entire telescope, and there are options for telescopes with better accessories at and above the PowerSeeker 70AZ’s price.

The scope also touts itself as coming with astronomy/planetarium software. This software is outdated and can be easily dispensed with by the free software program Stellarium.

The Mount with 70AZ

The Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ’s mount is certainly not worthy of much in the way of praise, but it is not useless either.

The PowerSeeker 70AZ mount is an alt-azimuth fork design that works well for both terrestrial and astronomical purposes. There are no slow-motion controls, but the mount’s tension can be adjusted via small knobs, which works well enough. The aluminum tripod legs are small and thin, but just adequate enough to support the whole scope. Overall, the mount is not my favorite, but it works well enough.

Should I buy a Used Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ?

Unless it’s extremely cheap and you’re willing to deal with its shortcomings, a used Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ is probably a waste of your time and money.

Alternative Recommendations

If you’re looking for a better scope than the PowerSeeker 70AZ but have a budget of $100 or below, there are a number of superior options:

  • The Zhumell Z100 and Orion SkyScanner (which are very similar) have a larger aperture than the 70AZ, sharp parabolic optics, a wide field of view, decent included accessories, and are stable and easy to aim.
  • The Orion FunScope provides relatively fuzzy views due to its flawed optics, but it’s easier to use and more stable than the 70AZ.

For finding more options, we recommend you check out our Telescope Ranking page for telescopes priced below $100.

Aftermarket Accessory Recommendations

Upgrading the Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ is probably not worth the expense and hassle. You’d be better off saving your money for a different, and preferably larger/better, telescope.

What can you see with the Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ?

The Celestron PowerSeeker 70AZ’s small aperture limits its ability to show you much besides the Moon, planets, double stars, and a handful of the brightest deep-sky objects. The Moon will show a wealth of details, and you can view the phases of Venus and the ice caps of Mars. Jupiter’s cloud belts and the Great Red Spot (as well as the giant planet’s moons) should be visible along with Saturn’s moons, rings, and maybe a hint of its cloud belts or the Cassini Division in its rings.

Outside the solar system, you are again severely limited simply by the telescope’s small size (as well as the lack of an adequate finderscope). The Andromeda Galaxy is visible as a fuzz, as well as a few other galaxies with some difficulty. Globular clusters are all smudges. A fair amount of open star clusters are mildly interesting, as are some double stars, but don’t expect anything eye-popping, especially if you don’t have pristine dark skies.

Zane Landers

An amateur astronomer and telescope maker from Connecticut who has been featured on TIME magazineNational GeographicLa Vanguardia, and Clarin, The Guardian, The Arizona Daily Star, and Astronomy Technology Today and had won the Stellafane 1st and 3rd place Junior Awards in the 2018 Convention. Zane has owned over 425 telescopes, of which around 400 he has actually gotten to take out under the stars. These range from the stuff we review on TelescopicWatch to homemade or antique telescopes; the oldest he has owned or worked on so far was an Emil Busch refractor made shortly before the outbreak of World War I. Many of these are telescopes that he repaired or built.

1 thought on “Celestron’s PowerSeeker 70AZ Reviewed – Not Recommended”

  1. Red dot finder is attached backwards in the included picture. I have this scope, unfortunately it has astigmatism in the lenses. The tripod is not the worst. I think the TS70 is a better scope, but it comes with a worse tripod.


Leave a Comment