Our experts have ranked 150+ telescopes
Disclosure - If you buy something via our link, we may earn a commission with no additional expense to you.

Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ Review – Not Recommended

Celestron’s PowerSeeker 114EQ, like all of its siblings in the PowerSeeker line, are unusable scopes which we don’t recommend to beginners. However, the 114EQ is a little better than the other PowerSeekers.

Celestron’s PowerSeeker 114EQ is actually a great telescope, but the devil is in the details – it’s paired with a mount that cannot possibly hold it and accessories that are little more than decorations due to their absurdly low quality. You’d be hard-pressed to get this telescope aimed at anything let alone see anything with it. However, if you replaced all the accessories and stuck it on a Dobsonian mount you’d have a surprisingly decent instrument with great views. 

How It Stacks Up

Ranked #13 of 24 ~$100 telescopes

Rank 1
4.5
Rank 13
Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ
3.6
What We Like

  • Good optics
  • Mount works well at low power


What We Don't Like

  • Mount is shaky at high power
  • More expensive than tabletop Dobsonians and nowhere near as usable out of the box
  • Included eyepieces, Barlow, and finderscope are bad


Bottom Line
Not Recommended Telescope

The Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ provides a tube for a good telescope – but isn’t one in itself, so stay far, far away from buying one new. 

The Optical Tube of PowerSeeker 114EQ

The Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ is a standard 114mm f/8 Newtonian with a spherical primary mirror. These scopes have been around for decades and provide great images with little in the way of the coma that plagues faster focal ratio instruments. At this aperture and focal length, a spherical mirror provides images that are well within the tolerances of a typical parabolic mirror while being extremely easy and cheap to manufacture. The 114EQ has a 1.25” rack-and-pinion focuser, and thanks to the long focal ratio, collimating it is quite easy, if not bordering on trivial. The scope comes with a pair of tube rings for attaching it to the mount, which allows you to slide and rotate the tube as needed for balance as well as put the eyepiece in a convenient and comfortable location. 

Celestron 114EQ

Accessories

The accessories included with the Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ are, like all PowerSeeker accessories, atrocious. You get a 20mm eyepiece, a 4mm eyepiece, a 3x Barlow lens, and a 5×24 finderscope. Not one of these has anything resembling quality.

The included 20mm eyepiece, providing 45x with the Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ, is supposedly a Kellner, but it has an erecting prism in it to flip the image right-side up, so that you can view birds with your massive and wobbly Newtonian reflector on an equatorial mount (this is actually why Celestron includes it – to market it as usable for terrestrial applications). As a side effect, this prism massively reduces sharpness, sucks up a good portion of the light entering the eyepiece, and reduces the apparent field of view to around 30 degrees, which makes using it feel like you’re looking through a soda straw.

The PowerSeeker 4mm Ramsden eyepiece also has the soda straw experience, with the bonus of providing too much magnification to be actually useful (225x) and also requiring jamming your eyeball up to the tiny lens to see anything through it (which won’t be much, trust us).

The 3x Barlow included with all PowerSeeker telescopes is made out of plastic, completely useless, and exists purely so Celestron can advertise the telescopes as capable of over 600 power – which almost no telescope is capable of on a consistent basis, especially not a small and wobbly beginner instrument – and serves as purely marketing bogus. You can use it as a spare lens cap or throw it in the garbage.

Lastly, the PowerSeekers come with a plastic 5×24 finderscope to aim the telescope. Not only does this finder have poor optics and a slide-tube focusing mechanism that is almost impossible to adjust correctly, but it doesn’t fit in the bracket well and basically doesn’t ever stay aligned with the telescope. You would be best off unscrewing the lenses from the finder and sighting through the empty tube. Seriously.

The PowerSeeker EQ1 Mount

The PowerSeeker EQ scopes all come with the same EQ1 equatorial mount. The EQ1 isn’t actually terrible; it’s made out of a mix of aluminum and plastic and does just fine holding a small telescope or a DSLR and lens. However, the 114EQ is not exactly small, and basically cannot balance properly on the mount. You will constantly be fumbling with the telescope crashing into the mount, moving of its own accord the instant you let go of it, or literally toppling over to the ground. Coupled with the insanely bad finderscope and the unusable eyepieces provided with the telescope, we wouldn’t exactly have high hopes for your ability to see anything with this telescope. Getting it pointed at the Moon would be a massive success.

Should I buy a Used Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ?

If you’re willing to do some DIY and find a PowerSeeker 114EQ for under $50 or so, you could build a Dobsonian mount for it, equip it with a good finder and eyepieces, and be rewarded with some surprisingly good views. Otherwise, don’t bother.

Alternative Recommendations

Pretty much any telescope with good optics, a stable mounting, and useful accessories would be an upgrade over the PowerSeeker line, but here are a few of our top picks in its price range:

  • The Zhumell Z114 offers the same aperture as the 114EQ, but with a wider field of view, better eyepieces, and a rock-solid and easy to use tabletop Dobsonian mount to boot.
  • For a bit less money, the Zhumell Z100 and Orion SkyScanner 100 have a bit less aperture than the PowerSeeker 114EQ, but are a lot easier to use and have decent accessories provided.

Pricing and Availability

When we first reviewed the Celestron PowerSeeker 114EQ back in December 2018, the price was $115. With the recent industry-wide price hike, the price might have gone higher. To know the current retail price, visit High Point Scientific (*not an affiliate link).

Leave a Comment